On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 11:25:14AM -0500, Benjamin Romer wrote:
> Add a comment to the charqueue's spinlock to explain that it is a lock for the
> structure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Romer <benjamin.romer@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/staging/unisys/visorutil/charqueue.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/unisys/visorutil/charqueue.c b/drivers/staging/unisys/visorutil/charqueue.c
> index 1ce7003..46582f1 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/unisys/visorutil/charqueue.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/unisys/visorutil/charqueue.c
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
> struct charqueue {
> int alloc_size;
> int nslots;
> - spinlock_t lock;
> + spinlock_t lock; /*read/write lock for this structure*/
What's the adversion to using ' ' in a comment block? :)
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
