On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 04:04:42PM -0800, steph wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 01:21:39PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 12:42:48PM -0800, Stephanie Wallick wrote:
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(mausb_register_ms_driver);
> >
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL()? I have to ask...
> >
> The source is dual-licenced under BSD and GPL. It was our understanding
> that dual-licensed should use EXPORT_SYMBOL() instead. Is that wrong?
Talk to your company lawyers please to get confirmation of what you want
to do here, I can't answer this question, I just have to ask...
> > > +static int mausb_hcd_init(void)
> > > +{
> > > + int ret;
> > > +
> > > + /* register HCD driver */
> > > + ret = platform_driver_register(&mausb_driver);
> >
> > Why is this a platform driver? How does this relate to platform
> > hardware?
> >
> The driver doesn't require platform resources. It looks like a host
> controller driver but communicates over the network instead of to
> a physical host controller. There is no MA USB-specific hardware.
>
> Should we use a struct device instead of a struct platform_device?
Yes, please make it a "virtual" device.
thanks,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
