Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Mon, 2014-10-27 at 07:16 +0100, Jes Sorensen wrote:
>> Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> > On Mon, 2014-10-27 at 06:45 +0100, Jes Sorensen wrote:
>> >> Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> >> > On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 16:18 +0000, Paul McQuade wrote:
>> >> >> ERROR: spaces required around that ':' (ctx:VxE)
>> > []
>> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_ieee80211.c
>> >> >> b/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_ieee80211.c
>> > []
>> >> >> @@ -794,28 +794,28 @@ u16 rtw_mcs_rate23a(u8 rf_type, u8 bw_40MHz, u8 short_GI_20, u8 short_GI_40,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> if (rf_type == RF_1T1R) {
>> >> >> if (mcs->rx_mask[0] & BIT(7))
>> >> >> - max_rate = (bw_40MHz) ? ((short_GI_40)?1500:1350):
>> >> >> + max_rate = (bw_40MHz) ? ((short_GI_40)?1500:1350) :
>> > []
>> >> >
>> >> > A macro could help intelligibility here - maybe something like:
>> >> >
>> >> > #define get_max_rate(r1, r2, r3, r4) \
>> >> > (bw_40MHz ? (short_GI_40 ? r1 : r2) : (short_GI_20 ? r3 : r4))
>> >> > and:
>> >> > if (mcs->rx_mask[0] & BIT(7))
>> >> > max_rate = get_max_rate(1500, 1350, 722, 650);
>> >>
>> >> Hiding a parameter to a macro like that is bad coding practice, so don't
>> >> do that please!
>> >
>> > Yes and no.
>> >
>> > Adding the other 3 arguments to the macro doesn't help legibility.
>> >
>> > Keeping the macro definition local to the place that it's used
>> > can help avoid typos.
>>
>> It's wrong, so just don't do it here!
>
> It's not "wrong", you just don't like it.
I consider it wrong, and I am the co-maintainer of this driver .... and
I NACK it.
There's a gazillion real issues to fix in this driver, adding a bad
macro isn't on that list.
Jes
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
