On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 09:08:28PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > >>>>> "Sitsofe" == Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > Sitsofe> Microsoft Hyper-V virtual disks currently only claim SPC-2 > Sitsofe> compliance causing the kernel skip checks for features such as > Sitsofe> thin provisioning even though the virtual disk advertises them. > > Last time around we identified this as a problem with Microsoft's > interpretation of the T10 SBC spec. And they promised that they are > going to fix that. OK but if we were happy to wait for Microsoft to fix the problem on the host why were the (broken and incomplete) BLIST_SKIP_VPD_PAGES patches committed to 3.17 rather than withdrawn? What's going to be done about those patches now? -- Sitsofe | http://sucs.org/~sits/ _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
