Hi Greg,
Sorry for noob question. I am still new to Kernel development.
I understood from your comment that the patch did not apply cleanly to
your tree (may be due to change in the code which I have modified)
But what should I do after this?
1) Send patch on rebased file to same mail chain with (--in-reply-to)
and [PATCH V4] ? OR
2) Create new PATCH and start new mail chain done on latest code.
Regards,
Nitin
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 4:14 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 02:32:26PM +0200, Nitin Kuppelur wrote:
>> Removed unnecessary else after return to solve
>> checkpatch.pl warning
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nitin Kuppelur <nitinkuppelur@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/rtl8712/hal_init.c | 7 ++-----
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/hal_init.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/hal_init.c
>> index 81cd654..fbaba11 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/hal_init.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/hal_init.c
>> @@ -387,12 +387,9 @@ uint rtl8712_hal_deinit(struct _adapter *padapter)
>> uint rtl871x_hal_init(struct _adapter *padapter)
>> {
>> padapter->hw_init_completed = false;
>> - if (padapter->halpriv.hal_bus_init == NULL)
>> + if (padapter->halpriv.hal_bus_init == NULL ||
>> + padapter->halpriv.hal_bus_init(padapter) != _SUCCESS)
>> return _FAIL;
>> - else {
>> - if (padapter->halpriv.hal_bus_init(padapter) != _SUCCESS)
>> - return _FAIL;
>> - }
>> if (rtl8712_hal_init(padapter) == _SUCCESS)
>> padapter->hw_init_completed = true;
>> else {
>
> This doesn't apply to my tree :(
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
