Re: [PATCH 01/44] kernel: Add support for poweroff handler call chain

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello

This seems exactly what I would need on the mc13783 to handle cleanly the poweroff,
but after reading this patchset I have the following question:

[...]

+/*
+ *	Notifier list for kernel code which wants to be called
+ *	to power off the system.
+ */
+static ATOMIC_NOTIFIER_HEAD(poweroff_handler_list);

[...]

+void do_kernel_poweroff(void)
+{
+	atomic_notifier_call_chain(&poweroff_handler_list, 0, NULL);
+}
+

It seems that the poweroff callback needs to be atomic as per
_atomic_notifier_call_chain documentation:

	"Calls each function in a notifier chain in turn.  The functions
	 run in an atomic context"

But this is a problem for many MFD (mc13783, twl4030 etc ...) which are
accessible on only a blocking bus (SPI, I2C).

What I am missing here ?

Thanks,

Philippe
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux