This patch fix the sparse warnings in wlan-ng/cfg80211.c
The following functions were only used in this file, so done by
declaring them into static.
drivers/staging/wlan-ng/cfg80211.c:710:6: warning: symbol
'prism2_connect_result' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/staging/wlan-ng/cfg80211.c:719:6: warning: symbol
'prism2_disconnected' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/staging/wlan-ng/cfg80211.c:725:6: warning: symbol
'prism2_roamed' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Quentin Lee <lee.rhapsody@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/staging/wlan-ng/cfg80211.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/cfg80211.c
b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/cfg80211.c
index 723319e..9e65429 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/cfg80211.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/cfg80211.c
@@ -707,7 +707,7 @@ exit:
/* Interface callback functions, passing data back up to the cfg80211 layer */
-void prism2_connect_result(wlandevice_t *wlandev, u8 failed)
+static void prism2_connect_result(wlandevice_t *wlandev, u8 failed)
{
u16 status = failed ?
WLAN_STATUS_UNSPECIFIED_FAILURE : WLAN_STATUS_SUCCESS;
@@ -716,13 +716,13 @@ void prism2_connect_result(wlandevice_t
*wlandev, u8 failed)
NULL, 0, NULL, 0, status, GFP_KERNEL);
}
-void prism2_disconnected(wlandevice_t *wlandev)
+static void prism2_disconnected(wlandevice_t *wlandev)
{
cfg80211_disconnected(wlandev->netdev, 0, NULL,
0, GFP_KERNEL);
}
-void prism2_roamed(wlandevice_t *wlandev)
+static void prism2_roamed(wlandevice_t *wlandev)
{
cfg80211_roamed(wlandev->netdev, NULL, wlandev->bssid,
NULL, 0, NULL, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
--
1.7.9.5
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
