Hi, 2014-09-24 18:45 GMT+09:00 Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 09:22:36AM +0900, Daeseok Youn wrote: >> static void dgap_release_remap(struct board_t *brd) >> { >> - release_mem_region(brd->membase, 0x200000); >> - release_mem_region(brd->membase + PCI_IO_OFFSET, 0x200000); >> - iounmap(brd->re_map_membase); >> - iounmap(brd->re_map_port); >> + if (brd->re_map_membase) { > > I hate this if conditions. Let's not complicate dgap_release_remap(), > let's fix the callers instead. Especially dgap_init_module() is a > totally sucky function with bad unwinding. ok. then, if (brd->re_map_membase && brd->re_map_port) dgap_release_remap(brd); right? > > Let's not apply this patch. oh.. this patch was already applied to staging tree. I will make different patch for this. thanks. regards, Daeseok Youn. > > regards, > dan carpenter > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel