Checkpatch --strict advises that spinlocks should be described when
defined, seems a good idea so this change does that.
Signed-off-by: Mark Einon <mark.einon@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/staging/et131x/et131x.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/et131x/et131x.c b/drivers/staging/et131x/et131x.c
index cebd997..8b2f9a9 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/et131x/et131x.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/et131x/et131x.c
@@ -474,10 +474,9 @@ struct et131x_adapter {
bool has_eeprom;
u8 eeprom_data[2];
- /* Spinlocks */
- spinlock_t tcb_send_qlock;
- spinlock_t tcb_ready_qlock;
- spinlock_t rcv_lock;
+ spinlock_t tcb_send_qlock; /* protects the tx_ring send tcb list */
+ spinlock_t tcb_ready_qlock; /* protects the tx_ring ready tcb list */
+ spinlock_t rcv_lock; /* protects the rx_ring receive list */
/* Packet Filter and look ahead size */
u32 packet_filter;
--
2.1.0
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
