On Tuesday, September 09, 2014 3:08 AM, Ian Abbott wrote: > On 2014-09-09 00:18, H Hartley Sweeten wrote: >> In order for DMA to work we also need an interrupt. Refactor the code >> so that the DMA allocation is only done if the interrupt is available. >> >> Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Ian Abbott <abbotti@xxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/adl_pci9118.c | 19 ++++++++++--------- >> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/adl_pci9118.c b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/adl_pci9118.c >> index 7a55c9c..f924ad9 100644 >> --- a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/adl_pci9118.c >> +++ b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/adl_pci9118.c >> @@ -1775,8 +1775,16 @@ static int pci9118_common_attach(struct comedi_device *dev, int disable_irq, >> >> pci9118_reset(dev); >> >> - if (master) >> - pci9118_alloc_dma(dev); > > Are we missing a patch series? I can't see when pci9118_alloc_dma() was > introduced in previous patch series. Gah... I based the series off the wrong head. Greg, Please drop this series. I will repost in a bit with the correct series. Sorry for the noise, Hartley _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
