On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 08:09:48PM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote: > The host asks the guest to scan when a LUN is removed or added. > The only way a guest can identify the removed LUN is when an I/O is > attempted on a removed LUN - the SRB status code indicates that the LUN > is invalid. We currently handle this SRB status and remove the device. > > Rather than waiting for an I/O to remove the device, force the discovery of > LUNs that may have been removed prior to discovering LUNs that may have > been added. This looks pretty reasonable to me, but I wonder if we should move this up to common code so that it happens for any host rescan triggered by sysfs or other drivers as well. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
