Re: [PATCH] staging: visorchipset: fix sparse warnings about static declaration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 10:10:22AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> Some functions were prototyped as static but the actual definition
> wasn't. While this is valid (the function is static because the two
> declarations don't conflict and the first one is static), this makes
> sparse unhappy and cause confusion of normal people too.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Bernat <vincent@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../unisys/visorchipset/visorchipset_main.c        | 22 +++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

This no longer applies cleanly to my tree, can you please refresh it and
resend so that I can apply it?

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux