On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 16:44 +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Christoph Hellwig (hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) [mailto:hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 8:11 AM > > To: KY Srinivasan > > Cc: Jens Axboe; James Bottomley; michaelc@xxxxxxxxxxx; Christoph Hellwig > > (hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx); linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > > gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx; linux- > > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; ohering@xxxxxxxx; apw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; > > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] [SCSI] Fix a bug in deriving the FLUSH_TIMEOUT > > from the basic I/O timeout > > > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:53:33PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote: > > > I still see this problem. There was talk of fixing it elsewhere. > > > > Well, what we have right not is entirely broken, given that the block layer > > doesn't initialize ->timeout on TYPE_FS requeuests. > > > > We either need to revert that initial commit or apply something like the > > attached patch as a quick fix. > I had sent this exact patch sometime back: > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg75385.html Actually, no you didn't. The difference is in the derivation of the timeout. Christoph's patch is absolute in terms of SD_TIMEOUT; yours is relative to the queue timeout setting ... I thought there was a reason for preferring the relative version. James _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
