On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:22:13PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 05:26:47PM +0200, Benoit Taine wrote: > > We should prefer `const struct pci_device_id` over > > `DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE` to meet kernel coding style guidelines. > > This issue was reported by checkpatch. > > Honestly, I prefer the macro -- it stands-out more. Maybe the style > guidelines and/or checkpatch should change instead? The macro is horrid, no other bus has this type of thing just to save a few characters in typing, so why should PCI be "special" in this regard anymore? thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
