Hi, Kristina, Thanks for reply. I hadn't developed for specific driver(I'm beginner to develop Linux Kernel :-) ), so I can make patches for other drivers. I just wanted to know what I have to do for revert your change. Thanks. regards, Daeseok Youn. 2014-07-03 1:25 GMT+09:00 Kristina Martšenko <kristina.martsenko@xxxxxxxxx>: > On 02/07/14 12:41, DaeSeok Youn wrote: >> Hi, all. >> >> I saw your change which removes cxt1e1 in staging tree. >> Actually, I have been cleaning up coding style and fixing minor issues >> without real cxt1e1 hardware. >> >> And I am not cleaning up all of files in cxt1e1 but some files already >> done and have plans for other files. >> >> may be.. I cannot fix major issues because I don't have a real device >> but minor issues can be fixed and coding style also. >> If you want to fix majors' which can be with real device, stay >> removed. But if it can be reverted for fixing minor issues including >> coding style, please revert. >> >> I cannot focus all of my time on making patches, but I can make >> patches steadily for that module. > > Hi DaeSeok, > > Thanks for the patches, but there needs to be progress made towards > moving the driver out of staging. There's not much point in fixing > coding style and other smaller issues if larger issues remain unfixed > and the driver eventually gets deleted anyway. > > I don't really know what needs to be done to get it moved out at all, > since the driver never had a TODO file and the original thread [1] > doesn't say much, so I don't know if it requires the hardware or not, > but I suspect it does. > > Maybe you could work on another driver? > > Sorry, > Kristina > > [1] http://marc.info/?t=125658854000001&r=1&w=4 _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
