On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 07:26:20PM +0200, Emil Goode wrote: > Hello Greg, > > On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 09:33:34AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 11:25:51AM +0200, Emil Goode wrote: > > > We need to make sure the struct rtllib_device pointer ieee is not NULL > > > after the goto rx_dropped label since it is dereferenced there. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Emil Goode <emilgoode@xxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtllib_rx.c | 3 ++- > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtllib_rx.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtllib_rx.c > > > index 60de54c..7db3e74 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtllib_rx.c > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtllib_rx.c > > > @@ -1496,7 +1496,8 @@ int rtllib_rx(struct rtllib_device *ieee, struct sk_buff *skb, > > > return ret; > > > > > > rx_dropped: > > > - ieee->stats.rx_dropped++; > > > + if (ieee) > > > + ieee->stats.rx_dropped++; > > > return 0; > > > } > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(rtllib_rx); > > > > Is this something that is hitting users today in the tree, or is this > > just a bug you found looking at the code? > > It's a static checker fix and I'm not aware of any impact on users. > If you want I will resend with that information added? No, that's fine, just trying to see which kernel to apply this to... thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
