On Wed, 02 Jul 2014, micky wrote: > On 06/18/2014 04:00 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > >On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > > >>On 16 June 2014 14:20, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>>From: Micky Ching <micky_ching@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> > >>>>rtsx driver using a single function for transfer data, dma map/unmap are > >>>>placed in one fix function. We need map/unmap dma in different place(for > >>>>mmc async driver), so add three function for dma map, dma transfer and > >>>>dma unmap. > >>>> > >>>>Signed-off-by: Micky Ching <micky_ching@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>>--- > >>>> drivers/mfd/rtsx_pcr.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- > >>>> include/linux/mfd/rtsx_pci.h | 6 ++++ > >>>> 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) > >>>I don't see any glaring issues with this patch. Does it rely on the > >>>first patch, or vise versa, or can it just be applied? > >>The mmc part in patch2 relies on this one, but please go ahead and > >>apply the mfd patch if you see it good. > >> > >>I can later provide my ack for the mmc parts, in patch2, when it's a > >>reviewed properly and thus you can take it through your tree. > >There's no rush. Once you're happy with the MMC patch, Micky can > >submit them both again with my Ack on the MFD part and I'll take them > >as a set. > > > Hi Lee, > > Can you pick this patch directly? need resend it now? No need to resend, I'll get round to applying it from here. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
