Dear all,
Thanks Joe's reminder. I've resent patch.
Sincerely,
Quentin
2014-06-25 23:28 GMT+08:00, Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 23:24 +0800, Cheng-Wei Lee wrote:
>> This patch fixes the following checkpatch.pl issues in hfa384x_usb.c:
>> WARNING: void function return statements are not generally useful
>
> subject/code mismatch.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Quentin Lee <lee.rhapsody@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/wlan-ng/hfa384x_usb.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/hfa384x_usb.c
>> b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/hfa384x_usb.c
>> index 98343ff7..07cee56 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/hfa384x_usb.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/hfa384x_usb.c
>> @@ -3705,6 +3705,7 @@ static void hfa384x_usbout_callback(struct urb
>> *urb)
>> case -EPIPE:
>> {
>> hfa384x_t *hw = wlandev->priv;
>> +
>> netdev_warn(hw->wlandev->netdev,
>> "%s tx pipe stalled: requesting reset\n",
>> wlandev->netdev->name);
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
