Hi Thierry, Le Tue, 24 Jun 2014 23:49:37 +0200, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 12:11:22PM +0200, Denis Carikli wrote: > [...] > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/panel/eukrea,mbimxsd51-dvi-svga.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/panel/eukrea,mbimxsd51-dvi-svga.txt > [...] > > @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ > > +Eukrea DVI-SVGA (800x600 pixels) DVI output. > [...] > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/panel/eukrea,mbimxsd51-dvi-vga.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/panel/eukrea,mbimxsd51-dvi-vga.txt > [...] > > @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ > > +Eukrea DVI-VGA (640x480 pixels) DVI output. > > DVI outputs shouldn't be using the panel framework and this binding at > all. DVI usually has the means to determine all of this by itself. Why > do you need to represent this as a panel in device tree? > because on this very simple display board, we only have DVI LVDS signals without the I2C to detect the display. Best regards Eric _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel