Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 04:50:08PM +0200, Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Greg, >> >> Thanks for merging the last set. I starting going through the code >> again, and removed a pile of dead code (patches 1-7). >> >> However in the process I noticed a couple of cases where raw beacon >> frame information was copied to a new wlan network struct, but the >> retrieved information wasn't, which can leave to trying to access the >> network with parameters that do not match that of the access point >> (patches 8-9). >> >> There is also a fix for a case where we in AP mode would send out a >> corrupted frame on the wire (patch 10). >> >> Patch 11 is a simple cleanup. >> >> It would be nice if it can all make it into staging-next, but if not, >> 8, 9, and 10 are rather serious and really need to go in. > > There's no problem getting anything into staging-next for a next few > weeks until 3.16-rc7 or so. Great, thanks! I got a little confused since I saw two branches showing up again when I pulled the latest staging tree :) Cheers, Jes _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
