Hi Christian! Yes! I mail about this for the first time in early May, but ther were many other faults in the design of my patch, had several different types of errors in the same path etc. So good that they have already been solved then :) Best regards Rickard Strandqvist 2014-06-01 23:50 GMT+02:00 Christian Engelmayer <cengelma@xxxxxx>: > On Sun, 1 Jun 2014 13:32:20 +0200, Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> There is a risk for memory leak in when something unexpected happens >> and the function returns. >> >> This was largely found by using a static code analysis program called cppcheck. >> >> Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > This doesn't apply against staging-next. This fix seems to attack the same > problem as existing commit 2af9e74 (staging: rtl8712: fix potential leaks in > r8712_set_key()) - http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-driver-devel/msg46501.html > > I think we talked about that already - see > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-driver-devel/msg46294.html > > Regards, > Christian _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
