Hi Dan I agree, this looks strange. Have been looking for a while in history with, to see if the code has been removed. I start my search using cppcheck for over three months ago. But could not find anything. Sorry about that :-( But I'll make a patch that completely removes testing variable then instead? Best regards Rickard Strandqvist 2014-06-01 22:37 GMT+02:00 Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 03:28:35PM +0200, Rickard Strandqvist wrote: >> There is a risk that the variable will be used without being initialized. >> >> This was largely found by using a static code analysis program called cppcheck. >> > > I've looked at the code, but I don't see this variable actually used > anywhere. What is the exact cppcheck warning message? > > regards, > dan carpenter > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
