On Fri, 16 May 2014 15:06:46 +0300, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 07:57:08AM -0400, Mark Hounschell wrote: > > On 05/16/2014 07:52 AM, Mark Hounschell wrote: > > > On 05/15/2014 06:49 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > >> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:27:01AM +0200, Christian Engelmayer wrote: > > >>> Hi, > > >>> > > >>> As I got a bit queued up for dgap, I just noticed that commit 542f3d5a states > > >>> to add Mark to the maintainers list for dgap, while the patch addresses the > > >>> dgnc entry. Was that the intention? > > >> > > >> No, it wasn't at all. Mark, please send a patch which moves you to the > > >> correct MAINTAINERS section. > > >> > > > > > > Sure. How did I mess that up? Hope Greg catches it. > > > > > > > Actually that patch might be OK as I have these digi NEO cards also and > > will eventually be willing to do some of the same type of work on the > > dgnc and dgdm (one greg adds it) as I've been doing on the dgap. > > Heh. That worked out nicely. :) That's very good indeed :) Also glad I waited for Your outstanding patches to be applied. Commit 077c28f (staging: dgap: Fix how we insure config data is a string) should fix two bugs that recently showed up under static analysis: The off-by-one issue for 'dgap_config_buf' under Coverity defect ID 1195252, as well as the use after free issue for 'fw' under CID 1195275. Regards, Christian _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
