There is otherwise a risk of a possible null pointer dereference. Was largely found by using a static code analysis program called cppcheck. Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/staging/tidspbridge/rmgr/node.c | 4 ++-- 1 fil ändrad, 2 tillägg(+), 2 borttagningar(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/tidspbridge/rmgr/node.c b/drivers/staging/tidspbridge/rmgr/node.c index 9d3044a..94c2cce 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/tidspbridge/rmgr/node.c +++ b/drivers/staging/tidspbridge/rmgr/node.c @@ -2361,8 +2361,7 @@ static void delete_node(struct node_object *hnode, struct node_taskargs task_arg_obj; #ifdef DSP_DMM_DEBUG struct dmm_object *dmm_mgr; - struct proc_object *p_proc_object = - (struct proc_object *)hnode->processor; + struct proc_object *p_proc_object; #endif int status; if (!hnode) @@ -2431,6 +2430,7 @@ static void delete_node(struct node_object *hnode, dsp_heap_res_addr, pr_ctxt); #ifdef DSP_DMM_DEBUG + p_proc_object = (struct proc_object *)hnode->processor; status = dmm_get_handle(p_proc_object, &dmm_mgr); if (dmm_mgr) dmm_mem_map_dump(dmm_mgr); -- 1.7.10.4 _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
