Re: [RESEND PATCH] staging: dgnc: use dev_err() instead of printk()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 01:59:25PM +0200, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
> Am 2014-05-05 13:35, schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> > On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 12:29:39PM +0200, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
> >> Use dev_err() instead of printk() and remove "dgnc:" from the message.
> >> This should provide userspace with more useful information and use
> >> the common kernel coding style.
> >>
> > 
> > Whenever I see a "RESEND" in a subject and no explanation then it means
> > our development process has broken down.  Meanwhile this is the first
> > time I have seen this patch so the problem is not on our side.
> > 
> > regards,
> > dan carpenter
> > 
> 
> I just resent https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/29/164 after waiting a week
> or so. I don't see any breakdown.

What I'm saying is just put an explanation after the --- cut off so we
know what you did wrong the first time.

Signed-off-by ...
---
Resending because I sent it to the wrong email list the first time.
Oops!  Next time I will use get_maintainer.pl, I promise!


Just a simple explanation like that is ok.

regards,
dan carpenter

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux