On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 09:20:06PM -0400, Oleg Drokin wrote: > > On May 3, 2014, at 7:29 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 10:21:52PM -0400, Oleg Drokin wrote: > >> Insted of meddling directly in process environment variables > >> (which is also not possible on certain platforms due to not exported > >> symbols), create jobid_name proc file to represent this info > >> (to be filled by job scheduler epilogue). > > That looks better, but what are you going to do about getting rid of all > > of these proc files? Just move them all at once? I really don't like > > the idea of adding new ones, and want a plan for what you all are going > > to do here moving forward. > > What proc files are to referring to, if I may ask? All of them :) > I don't think I saw complaints about proc files, the complaints I saw were mostly about > reading env variables directly and the like so that was the focus of this patch. > Did I miss some side discussion? Any pointers? No, no side discussion, the proc files need to be removed / fixed before the code can be merged to the "proper" part of the kernel tree. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
