CC to Stephen Rothwell > This isn't a "staging" driver, so why is "staging" in the Subject? I made this patch based on linux-next. "media" directory really exist in current linux-next. For example... https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/drivers/staging?id=refs/tags/next-20140430 But as I see the patch itself carefully, the path "staging" does NOT included. So it seemed something going wrong with linux-next merger. I will resend the patch with correct title and correct mailing list later on. Thanks. Masanari On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 8:43 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 07:51:13PM +0900, Masanari Iida wrote: >> Fix format string mismatch in bw-qcam.c >> >> Signed-off-by: Masanari Iida <standby24x7@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/media/parport/bw-qcam.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/media/parport/bw-qcam.c b/drivers/media/parport/bw-qcam.c >> index 8a0e84c..416507a 100644 >> --- a/drivers/media/parport/bw-qcam.c >> +++ b/drivers/media/parport/bw-qcam.c > > This isn't a "staging" driver, so why is "staging" in the Subject? > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
