[patch] staging: rtl8192u: cleanup a switch statement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The white space was all wrong here.  The case statements were indented
too far.  The if else blocks weren't indented at all.  There was a break
statement aligned with the else block and it confused my static checker
because "were curly braces intended" so that the break statement was
only on the else side?  Also I removed some commented out code.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_softmac.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_softmac.c
index 2131912..9caf6fd 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_softmac.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_softmac.c
@@ -1903,20 +1903,17 @@ static void ieee80211_process_action(struct ieee80211_device *ieee,
 	}
 	tmp = *act;
 	act ++;
-	switch (tmp)
-	{
-		case ACT_CAT_BA:
-			if (*act == ACT_ADDBAREQ)
+	switch (tmp) {
+	case ACT_CAT_BA:
+		if (*act == ACT_ADDBAREQ)
 			ieee80211_rx_ADDBAReq(ieee, skb);
-			else if (*act == ACT_ADDBARSP)
+		else if (*act == ACT_ADDBARSP)
 			ieee80211_rx_ADDBARsp(ieee, skb);
-			else if (*act == ACT_DELBA)
+		else if (*act == ACT_DELBA)
 			ieee80211_rx_DELBA(ieee, skb);
-			break;
-		default:
-//			if (net_ratelimit())
-//			IEEE80211_DEBUG(IEEE80211_DL_BA, "unknown action frame(%d)\n", tmp);
-			break;
+		break;
+	default:
+		break;
 	}
 	return;
 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux