2014-04-26 7:33 GMT+09:00, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 12:03:41PM +0900, Daeseok Youn wrote: >> >> The bp_proc_create() can be called if BP_PROC_SUPPORT is defined. >> >> Signed-off-by: Daeseok Youn <daeseok.youn@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/staging/silicom/bpctl_mod.c | 5 +++++ >> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/silicom/bpctl_mod.c >> b/drivers/staging/silicom/bpctl_mod.c >> index 6b9365b..5a3d758 100644 >> --- a/drivers/staging/silicom/bpctl_mod.c >> +++ b/drivers/staging/silicom/bpctl_mod.c >> @@ -119,7 +119,10 @@ static void if_scan_init(void); >> >> static int bypass_proc_create_dev_sd(struct bpctl_dev >> *pbp_device_block); >> static int bypass_proc_remove_dev_sd(struct bpctl_dev >> *pbp_device_block); >> + >> +#ifdef BP_PROC_SUPPORT >> static int bp_proc_create(void); >> +#endif > > No, this code should just be removed, right? Yes, someone sent a patch for this. Regards, Daeseok Youn > > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
