On Fri, 2014-03-21 at 00:34 +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> On 03/20/2014 01:04 AM, Cédric Cabessa wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/usbip/vhci_hcd.c b/drivers/staging/usbip/vhci_hcd.c
[]
> > @@ -271,12 +271,14 @@ static int vhci_hub_control(struct usb_hcd *hcd, u16 typeReq, u16 wValue,
> > }
> > break;
> > case USB_PORT_FEAT_POWER:
> > - usbip_dbg_vhci_rh(" ClearPortFeature: USB_PORT_FEAT_POWER\n");
> > + usbip_dbg_vhci_rh(
> > + " ClearPortFeature: USB_PORT_FEAT_POWER\n");
>
> Your version of scripts/checkpatch.pl seems outdated. It shouldn't
> complain about strings violating 80-column limit (and I've just verified it
> doesn't).
checkpatch complains about > 80 char lines for lines with
a function where the function name isn't understood to be
a logging use.
uspip_dbg_<foo> doesn't take the general form so if the
string at the EOL exceeds 80 chars, a message is emitted.
Long standalone strings on a single line do not get warnings.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
