On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 09:20:34AM +0100, Mathieu Maret wrote:
> Multi statement macro should use do{}while(0)
>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Maret <mathieu.maret@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/staging/wlags49_h2/wl_netdev.c | 8 +++++---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/wlags49_h2/wl_netdev.c b/drivers/staging/wlags49_h2/wl_netdev.c
> index 255d291..6455956 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/wlags49_h2/wl_netdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/wlags49_h2/wl_netdev.c
> @@ -107,9 +107,11 @@
> * macros
> ******************************************************************************/
> #define BLOCK_INPUT(buf, len) \
> - desc->buf_addr = buf; \
> - desc->BUF_SIZE = len; \
> - status = hcf_rcv_msg(&(lp->hcfCtx), desc, 0)
> + do { \
> + desc->buf_addr = buf; \
> + desc->BUF_SIZE = len; \
> + status = hcf_rcv_msg(&(lp->hcfCtx), desc, 0) \
> + } while (0)
>
> #define BLOCK_INPUT_DMA(buf, len) memcpy( buf, desc_next->buf_addr, pktlen )
>
You didn't test-build the code after making this change, as this patch
breaks the build into lots of tiny pieces :(
Please ALWAYS test your patches.
I've applied the first 3 patches, please fix this one up (if it's even
possible, hint, I don't think it is...) and resend the remaining
patches.
thanks,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
