On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 07:57:51PM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote: > [Added Shawn to Cc:] > > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 05:56:12PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 10:20:51AM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > this latest version of the imx-drm DT binding patches applies > >> > on top of staging-next and also depends on the OF graph binding > >> > patchset that moves the v4l2_of helpers to drivers/of. > >> > Currently, the two patchsets are also available at: > >> > git://git.pengutronix.de/git/pza/linux.git topic/of-graph > >> > git://git.pengutronix.de/git/pza/linux.git topic/imx-drm-dt > >> > >> Okay, having looked at the second tree, pulling that will result in > >> pulling in all of the staging tree here, which I'd rather not do. Unless > >> there's any objection, I'd like to take these as patches on top of the > >> imx-drm stuff which I sent to Greg plus the of-graph stuff which they > >> depend upon. In other words, exactly how I've been testing it today. > >> > >> Any objections? > > > > None from me! :) > > Nor from me. But I'd like to point out that there already is one merge issue > with Shawn's for-next branch in arch/arm/boot/dts/imx53-qsb.dts between > d5eb195 "ARM: dts: i.MX53: move common QSB nodes to new file" > and these two patches: > 17b5001 "imx-drm: convert to componentised device support". > "ARM: dts: imx53: Add IPU DI ports and endpoints, move imx-drm node to dtsi" > The first one already is in staging-next. Yes, I'm aware of that (since I've been encountering it when creating the build tree for my autobuilder.) Thanks. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: now at 9.7Mbps down 460kbps up... slowly improving, and getting towards what was expected from it. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel