On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 11:15:08PM -0800, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote: > Increase the maximum number of pfns we can handle is a single vmbus packet. Is that a correct sentance? > > Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > include/linux/hyperv.h | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/hyperv.h b/include/linux/hyperv.h > index 330ec44..ab7359f 100644 > --- a/include/linux/hyperv.h > +++ b/include/linux/hyperv.h > @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ > #include <linux/mod_devicetable.h> > > > -#define MAX_PAGE_BUFFER_COUNT 19 > +#define MAX_PAGE_BUFFER_COUNT 32 What is the problem if this number isn't changed? Again, I'm going to have to ask you, what kernel is this for? Please remember this when sending patches that look like they might be fixing a bug, you don't want me to guess, as my "guess" usually is "delete the patch". greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
