>On Monday, March 3, 2014 8:13 AM, Ian Abbott <abbotti@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>On 2014-03-02 04:13, Chase Southwood wrote: >>>On Friday, February 28, 2014 11:49 PM, Chase Southwood <chase.southwood@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On Friday, February 28, 2014 11:26 AM, Ian Abbott <abbotti@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> On 2014-02-28 07:35, Chase Southwood wrote: >> >> [snip] >> >>>> In the case of s626_send_dac(), it doesn't seem to be used in any >>>> critical sections, so it could make use of Hartley's comedi_timeout(). >>>> >>>> Some of the timeout errors could be propagated, especially for >>>> s626_send_dac() which is only reachable from very few paths. >>> >>> >>> Awesome, I'll swap all of my timeouts out for comedi_timeout() in s626_send_dac(). >> >> Actually, after taking another look at this, I don't think that using comedi_timeout() >> here is going to work, actually. >> The context from which s626_send_dac() is called allows sleep all right, but readl() isn't >> a comedi function and therefore it doesn't behave (in parameters or return values) as >> the callback function parameter to comedi_timeout() requires. So unless I'm missing >> something particularly large here, I believe we'll have to do the timeouts here manually >> as well. Am I correct here, and if so, would you like the iteration based timeouts here >> as well, or a sleep-based timeout similar to that employed by comedi_timeout()? > >The readl() could be done in a small callback function. As the >different while loops are checking for different results from readl(), >It would need a different callback functions for each case, or some >creative use of the callback function's 'context' parameter. > Oh, of course. I'll see if there's a reasonably clear way that I can use the context parameter to use a single callback, if not I'll just define a few of them. I'll send a patch with the new callback(s), and the timeouts in s626_send_dac() switched to comedi_timeout(), and I'll add the timeouts that were left out last time, and then another patch or patchset propagating everything upwards. Thanks, Chase > >-- >-=( Ian Abbott @ MEV Ltd. E-mail: <abbotti@xxxxxxxxx> )=- >-=( Tel: +44 (0)161 477 1898 FAX: +44 (0)161 718 3587 )=- >-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel