On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 08:11:40PM +0900, DaeSeok Youn wrote:
> Actually , I saw some code like this file which is seperate line
> between return value and function name.
> So I didn't make one line of them.
>
> Ok, I will make another patch after merge this one.
No, you are misunderstanding what I am saying. Those type of function
declarations are allowed in the kernel so the original code is fine.
What I am saying is this patch is doing two thing but it should be doing
only one thing.
> @@ -53,8 +53,8 @@ lnd_t the_o2iblnd = {
>
> kib_data_t kiblnd_data;
>
> -__u32
> -kiblnd_cksum (void *ptr, int nob)
> +static __u32
> +kiblnd_cksum(void *ptr, int nob)
> {
> char *c = ptr;
> __u32 sum = 0;
Changing the white space here is OK because it is a minor related
white space change.
> @@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ kiblnd_create_peer(lnet_ni_t *ni, kib_peer_t **peerp, lnet_nid_t nid)
> }
>
> void
> -kiblnd_destroy_peer (kib_peer_t *peer)
> +kiblnd_destroy_peer(kib_peer_t *peer)
> {
This is a random unrelated white space change, so do it in a separate
patch.
regards,
dan carpenter
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
