Hi Russell, Am Montag, den 10.02.2014, 17:56 +0000 schrieb Russell King - ARM Linux: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 06:37:26PM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote: > > I'd like all of them to go through, too. If you don't want to have the DT > > changes integrated, I'd appreciate if you could have a look at my > > patches on top of your series and possibly append them to your > > series or let me synchronize somehow: > > > > http://archive.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20140106.145159.a1d82ba9.en.html > > I replied to your 2nd patch there... > > I'm not happy ending up with a hard dependency between v4l2 code and > code needed for the display side to work, especially when we can end > up with imx-drm being the primary console display. I've outlined my > thoughts about what I think needs to happen in the reply to patch 2. Thanks for your comments there. I have just updated and resent this series ([RFC PATCH v3 0/9] imx-drm dt bindings), still with a temporary local copy of the v4l2_of functions, as long as the final resting place of the v4l2_of/of_graph functions seems to be a matter of discussion. regards Philipp _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
