On 02/15/2014 11:36 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 08:53:34AM +0100, Levente Kurusa wrote: >> Thanks Dan, maybe you know some people who could test it? >> RTLXXXXXX guys? Or maybe we can take the patch as is? >> I cannot really think of any other solution other than removing >> the other clause, but since that was written to the file, >> there must have been some logic behind that. I am slightly >> disappointed get_maintainer didn't really find anybody for >> this patch... > > This driver is going to be deleted in the next couple weeks and replaced > with a re-written from scratch driver. > Oh, I did not know that. Since this fix isn't that big, I think it won't get into the next -rc, and hence might not hit Linus' tree before the new driver gets into staging. I am not sure if it is worth applying if that is the case. -- Regards, Levente Kurusa _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
