On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 01:09 +0100, Martin Walch wrote: > On Tuesday 11 February 2014 13:31:32 Paul Bolle wrote: > > This patch also deserves a > > Reported-by: Martin Walch <walch.martin@xxxxxx> > > > > line, but that apparently requires Martin's permission. > > I would be happy. It seems I interpreted the requirements for Reported-By: tags rather strictly. We might change the documentation to discourage that interpretation. (Greg, is it too late to add this tag in your queue?) > And I am sorry for not sending patches myself. As I expect > to find some more issues in Kconfig files soon, I wanted to gather all of > them before sending any patches. However, I did not expect this to take me > so long. Therefore I am glad you took the initiative and just created > some patches. My experience is that one can easily get stuck when trying to fix all issues of a certain, broad category. Fixing all (say) all unused Kconfig symbols is a big job. Fixing all that got added in v3.14-rc1 is doable (depending on the amount of time one wants to spend). Anyhow, I do hope you find time to send in patches yourself. Perhaps it would help if we'd coordinate the stuff a bit. Richard seems keen to help too. Paul Bolle _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
