On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 08:28:33PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 4:23 AM, Oleg Drokin <green@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Jan 24, 2014, at 3:55 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 6:51 AM, Oleg Drokin <green@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>> +STAGING - LUSTRE > >>>> +M: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@xxxxxxxxx> > >>>> +M: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@xxxxxxxxx> > >>>> +M: Peng Tao <tao.peng@xxxxxxx>. > >>>> +L: hpdd-discuss <hpdd-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> +S: Odd Fixes > >>> > >>> Actually we are at least Maintained here, if not outright Supported. > >> > >> Good to hear that! > >> So can we assume that https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/9/725 will be fixed > >> shortly, > > > > We are working on it. > > Thanks! > > >> and http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/10508264/ > >> will turn green again? > > > > I certainly hope so. > > BTW, do you also provide interface where I can drop in my patch and your builder verify it for me by any chance, > > It's called linux-next, but Lustre is part of staging, which is already > included. No idea how lustre gets updated in thes staging tree, though. Like any other patch that gets sent to drivers/staging, through my staging.git tree. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
