On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 03:14:21PM +0100, walter harms wrote: > > > Am 28.01.2014 15:00, schrieb Dan Carpenter: > > These macros need parentheses, otherwise it causes a macro expansion bug > > when they are used like this: > > > > ch->flags &= ~IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IBSS; > > > > This was found using Smatch: > > drivers/staging/rtl8821ae/regd.c:200 _rtl_reg_apply_beaconing_flags() > > warn: the 'IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IBSS' macro might need parens > > > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8821ae/regd.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8821ae/regd.h > > index abc60ab8165c..dceb3f18200b 100644 > > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8821ae/regd.h > > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8821ae/regd.h > > @@ -30,8 +30,8 @@ > > #ifndef __RTL_REGD_H__ > > #define __RTL_REGD_H__ > > > > -#define IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IBSS 1<<2 > > -#define IEEE80211_CHAN_PASSIVE_SCAN 1<<1 > > +#define IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IBSS (1 << 2) > > +#define IEEE80211_CHAN_PASSIVE_SCAN (1 << 1) > > #define WIPHY_FLAG_CUSTOM_REGULATORY BIT(0) > > #define WIPHY_FLAG_STRICT_REGULATORY BIT(1) > > #define WIPHY_FLAG_DISABLE_BEACON_HINTS BIT(2) > > -- > > > just one minor hint ... > could we settle for a common semantic here either 1<<2 or BIT(2) ? > Yeah... This driver needs a lot of cleanup in later patches. regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
