Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] Staging: lustre: Fix return does not need parantheses

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 01:31:41AM +0530, Monam Agarwal wrote:
> The patch fixes the following checkpatch.pl error in
> lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c
> ERROR: return is not a function, parentheses are not required 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Monam Agarwal <monamagarwal123@xxxxxxxxx>

I'm totally confused here.  You have multiple series of patches, sent
with different version numbers, some with the same subjects, and some
not.

I've deleted all of your lustre patches from my queue because of this, I
don't want to apply something incorrectly.

Please step back, take a day, and resend all of your pending patches
that I have not applied for the lustre code, in a single series, so I
know what I should be looking at here.

There's no rush, so please take your time and do your best to keep an
overworked maintainer from getting things wrong.

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux