Samuel Thibault wrote: > Err, I'd rather make it really visible that the for loop doesn't have > its first statement? Wouldn't it be better if you add a comment there? So it would follow the coding style? -- Aldo Iljazi _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
