> From: Dan Carpenter [mailto:dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 6:14 AM > > Combine two conditions and make the success path explicit. > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > The code is more complicated than it needs to be because of the debug > code. If we just tested for error and then returned instead of trying > to print a debug message that is the easiest way. Debug code is not > often used. I don't like debug code very much. > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/dwc2/hcd_queue.c b/drivers/staging/dwc2/hcd_queue.c > index ad9136e9d820..5d188254728c 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/dwc2/hcd_queue.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/dwc2/hcd_queue.c > @@ -517,13 +517,11 @@ static int dwc2_schedule_periodic(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg, struct dwc2_qh *qh) > frame = status - 1; > > /* Set the new frame up */ > - if (frame > -1) { > + if (status >= 0) { > qh->sched_frame &= ~0x7; > qh->sched_frame |= (frame & 7); > - } > - > - if (status != -1) > status = 0; > + } > } else { > status = dwc2_periodic_channel_available(hsotg); > if (status) { > @@ -566,7 +564,7 @@ static int dwc2_schedule_periodic(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg, struct dwc2_qh *qh) > /* Update claimed usecs per (micro)frame */ > hsotg->periodic_usecs += qh->usecs; > > - return status; > + return 0; > } > > /** This touches the same function as the patch series "staging: dwc2: cleanups for DWC2 driver" that I have already submitted. If you don't mind, I will fold this patch into that series when I resubmit it to fix some other things. -- Paul _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel