This is for future reference, the current patch seems fine.
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 01:20:56PM -0700, Lisa Nguyen wrote:
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_resource.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_resource.c
> @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ static int lprocfs_ns_resources_seq_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> {
> struct ldlm_namespace *ns = m->private;
> __u64 res = 0;
> - cfs_hash_bd_t bd;
> + struct cfs_hash_bd bd;
> int i;
These are badly aligned. I assume you are using sed. Also there is an
extra space before the '=' on the first line and "i" is out of
alignment. So it was pretty ugly to begin with.
Really, don't use tabs, just use a single space.
struct ldlm_namespace *ns = m->private;
u64 res = 0;
struct cfs_hash_bd bd;
int i;
If you do it like that then later when you need to update the types then
you don't need to re-indent everything to match.
The difference between u64 and __u64 is that you have to use __u64 in
headers which are exported to userspace. This isn't a header so that
doesn't apply.
I haven't totally understood which lustre files are expected to be uapi.
Those should probably be more minimal and maybe in a separate directory.
regards,
dan carpenter
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
