Re: [Patch v2][ 03/37] drm: Add the lacking DRM_MODE_FLAG_* for matching the DISPLAY_FLAGS_*

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On 10/18/2013 09:46 AM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
+#define DRM_MODE_FLAG_PDATEN			(1<<22)
+#define DRM_MODE_FLAG_NDATEN			(1<<23)
+#define DRM_MODE_FLAG_PPIXDATEDGE		(1<<24)
+#define DRM_MODE_FLAG_NPIXDATEDGE		(1<<25)

Do we really need to make this stuff visible to userspace?
And there's no documentation to explain any of it.

DRM_MODE_FLAG_PDATEN and DRM_MODE_FLAG_NDATEN were meant to represent the data enable polarity.

DRM_MODE_FLAG_PPIXDATEDGE and DRM_MODE_FLAG_NPIXDATEDGE were meant to represent the clock polarity.

What would you recommend to represent theses polarities?

Denis.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux