On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:47:17PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote: > On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux > <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Shouldn't the above be in patch 1 (or 1.5) rather than patch 2? Patch 2 > > advertises itself as adding support for the wandboard, but in actual > > fact it's adding the generic bits too. > > Thanks for your review. Will address your comments in v3. > > Philipp Zabel mentioned that he will move imx-drm out of staging, so > will send v3 after Philipp's patch gets into linux-next. That's unfortunate, especially given the bug with the clock polarity (which, although I can tweak the register directly, it's not obvious that changing the clk_pol initialisation is the correct solution.) There's also another issue here: the lack of DRM prime support. As you have a separate GPU and separate VPU, you really need dmabuf support implemented so that you can hand your scanout buffers/overlays to other subsystems. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
