Re: [PATCH 5/6] staging: dgap: tty.c: removes smatch warnings "potential null dereference"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 06:13:47PM -0400, Lidza Louina wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:22:08PM -0400, Lidza Louina wrote:
> >>
> >> I looked at other uses of the function alloc_tty_driver() in
> >> the kernel and none of them seem to follow up with a
> >> call to kfree().
> >
> > Read my first response again.  I showed how to do this.  Your setting
> > up a bunch of things in a line.  If any of them fail you need to
> > cleanup by releasing any allocations.
> >
> > If you have an allocation from alloc_tty_driver() then you can't release
> > it with kfree() you need to use put_tty_driver().
> 
> Alrighty.
> 
> These are the examples I'd found in the kernel.
> 
> Case 1: tty/synclink.c: mgsl_init_tty(): The serial_driver is
> allocated, it checks for an error and returns -ENOMEM:
> 
>     serial_driver = alloc_tty_driver(128);
>     if (!serial_driver)
>         return -ENOMEM;
> 

It's not allocated, the allocation failed.  It does call
put_tty_driver() if the tty_register_driver() call fails so this
function is correct.


> The code doesn't call put_tty_driver until synclink_cleanup() is
> called. In synclink, the put_tty_driver only gets called when
> serial_driver is not null:
> 
>     if (serial_driver) {
>         if ((rc = tty_unregister_driver(serial_driver)))
>             printk("%s(%d) failed to unregister tty driver err=%d\n",
>                      __FILE__,__LINE__,rc);
>         put_tty_driver(serial_driver);
>     }
> 
> This is the case for most of the drivers I found, it returns -ENOMEM
> when the alloc fails, and calls put_tty_driver when something fails
> afterward (like when registering the device fails).

Yes.  That's correct.

> 
> Case 2: tty/rocket.c: rp_init(): rocket_driver is allocated using
> alloc_tty_driver, and we return ret:
>     int ret = -ENOMEM, pci_boards_found, isa_boards_found, i;
> 
>     rocket_driver = alloc_tty_driver(MAX_RP_PORTS);
>     if (!rocket_driver)
>         goto err;
>     .............(some code).............
>     err:
>         return ret;
> 
> put_tty_driver() gets called when we can't find an IO region:
> 
>     if (controller && (!request_region(controller, 4, "Comtrol RocketPort"))) {
>         printk(KERN_ERR "Unable to reserve IO region for first "
>         "configured ISA RocketPort controller 0x%lx.  "
>         "Driver exiting\n", controller);
>         ret = -EBUSY;
>         goto err_tty;
>     }
>     .............(some code).............
>     err_tty:
>         put_tty_driver(rocket_driver);
> 
> And after setting rocket_driver's flags, termios info, type, subtype,
> etc., it tries to register the driver:
> 
>     ret = tty_register_driver(rocket_driver);
>     if (ret < 0) {
>         printk(KERN_ERR "Couldn't install tty RocketPort driver\n");
>         goto err_controller;
>     }
>     .............(some code).............
>     err_controller:
>         if (controller)
>             release_region(controller, 4);
> 
> I would think that err_controller would have a call to put_tty_driver.
> Also I'd think that err_tty would go with the failed register_driver()
> call and the err_controller would math the failed request_region. Bad
> names? >_<

This function is also fine.  The names ok-ish.

err_tty puts the tty.
err_controller releases the controller region.
err_ttyu unregisters the tty.

The names are not great.  "ttyu" is a too short and who would know that
the 'u' stands for "unregister?"  It would be better to use
"err_unregister_tty:"

> 
> Case 3: tty/serial/msm_smd_tty.c: smd_tty_init(): This doesn't have a
> matching put_tty_driver after alloc_tty_driver.
> 

This one is buggy.  If tty_register_driver() fails then it should call
put_tty_driver().

> Case 4: tty/vt/vt.c: vty_init(): This code allocates the driver, then
> calls a panic function:
> 
>     console_driver = alloc_tty_driver(MAX_NR_CONSOLES);
>     if (!console_driver)
>         panic("Couldn't allocate console driver\n");
> 
> The code doesn't call put_tty_driver at any time, and I'm not sure
> what the panic function does. I grepped thru the tty drivers and
> couldn't find a declaration or definition for it.
> 

panic() means the kernel dies.  If you can't load the vt module then
there is no point in continueing and nothing you can do to recover.
vt is special and essential.

> There are more drivers I didn't look at, but I figured this would be
> enough for now.
> 
> Out of the 18 drivers I checked:
> - Most of them returned -ENOMEM when allocating failed and most used
> put_tty_driver when registering, requesting a region, or using kthread
> failed (not all)
> - One called put_tty_driver when the module_exit function was being
> called: tty/hvc/hvc_console.c

The hvc_console.c driver is fine.

> - One had no put_tty_driver call after it was allocated
> - One had a panic function when it encountered an error and I don't
> know what panic() does, but it doesnt seem to call put_tty_driver
> 
> I think I was just looking at the bad ones. >_< Do the ones I caught
> need fixing? :)

Only smd_tty_init().  The others are all ok.

regards,
dan carpenter
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux