On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 06:13:47PM -0400, Lidza Louina wrote: > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:22:08PM -0400, Lidza Louina wrote: > >> > >> I looked at other uses of the function alloc_tty_driver() in > >> the kernel and none of them seem to follow up with a > >> call to kfree(). > > > > Read my first response again. I showed how to do this. Your setting > > up a bunch of things in a line. If any of them fail you need to > > cleanup by releasing any allocations. > > > > If you have an allocation from alloc_tty_driver() then you can't release > > it with kfree() you need to use put_tty_driver(). > > Alrighty. > > These are the examples I'd found in the kernel. > > Case 1: tty/synclink.c: mgsl_init_tty(): The serial_driver is > allocated, it checks for an error and returns -ENOMEM: > > serial_driver = alloc_tty_driver(128); > if (!serial_driver) > return -ENOMEM; > It's not allocated, the allocation failed. It does call put_tty_driver() if the tty_register_driver() call fails so this function is correct. > The code doesn't call put_tty_driver until synclink_cleanup() is > called. In synclink, the put_tty_driver only gets called when > serial_driver is not null: > > if (serial_driver) { > if ((rc = tty_unregister_driver(serial_driver))) > printk("%s(%d) failed to unregister tty driver err=%d\n", > __FILE__,__LINE__,rc); > put_tty_driver(serial_driver); > } > > This is the case for most of the drivers I found, it returns -ENOMEM > when the alloc fails, and calls put_tty_driver when something fails > afterward (like when registering the device fails). Yes. That's correct. > > Case 2: tty/rocket.c: rp_init(): rocket_driver is allocated using > alloc_tty_driver, and we return ret: > int ret = -ENOMEM, pci_boards_found, isa_boards_found, i; > > rocket_driver = alloc_tty_driver(MAX_RP_PORTS); > if (!rocket_driver) > goto err; > .............(some code)............. > err: > return ret; > > put_tty_driver() gets called when we can't find an IO region: > > if (controller && (!request_region(controller, 4, "Comtrol RocketPort"))) { > printk(KERN_ERR "Unable to reserve IO region for first " > "configured ISA RocketPort controller 0x%lx. " > "Driver exiting\n", controller); > ret = -EBUSY; > goto err_tty; > } > .............(some code)............. > err_tty: > put_tty_driver(rocket_driver); > > And after setting rocket_driver's flags, termios info, type, subtype, > etc., it tries to register the driver: > > ret = tty_register_driver(rocket_driver); > if (ret < 0) { > printk(KERN_ERR "Couldn't install tty RocketPort driver\n"); > goto err_controller; > } > .............(some code)............. > err_controller: > if (controller) > release_region(controller, 4); > > I would think that err_controller would have a call to put_tty_driver. > Also I'd think that err_tty would go with the failed register_driver() > call and the err_controller would math the failed request_region. Bad > names? >_< This function is also fine. The names ok-ish. err_tty puts the tty. err_controller releases the controller region. err_ttyu unregisters the tty. The names are not great. "ttyu" is a too short and who would know that the 'u' stands for "unregister?" It would be better to use "err_unregister_tty:" > > Case 3: tty/serial/msm_smd_tty.c: smd_tty_init(): This doesn't have a > matching put_tty_driver after alloc_tty_driver. > This one is buggy. If tty_register_driver() fails then it should call put_tty_driver(). > Case 4: tty/vt/vt.c: vty_init(): This code allocates the driver, then > calls a panic function: > > console_driver = alloc_tty_driver(MAX_NR_CONSOLES); > if (!console_driver) > panic("Couldn't allocate console driver\n"); > > The code doesn't call put_tty_driver at any time, and I'm not sure > what the panic function does. I grepped thru the tty drivers and > couldn't find a declaration or definition for it. > panic() means the kernel dies. If you can't load the vt module then there is no point in continueing and nothing you can do to recover. vt is special and essential. > There are more drivers I didn't look at, but I figured this would be > enough for now. > > Out of the 18 drivers I checked: > - Most of them returned -ENOMEM when allocating failed and most used > put_tty_driver when registering, requesting a region, or using kthread > failed (not all) > - One called put_tty_driver when the module_exit function was being > called: tty/hvc/hvc_console.c The hvc_console.c driver is fine. > - One had no put_tty_driver call after it was allocated > - One had a panic function when it encountered an error and I don't > know what panic() does, but it doesnt seem to call put_tty_driver > > I think I was just looking at the bad ones. >_< Do the ones I caught > need fixing? :) Only smd_tty_init(). The others are all ok. regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel