On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:53 PM, KY Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I am not sure how that magic number was arrived at (the 60HZ number). We want this to be little higher -
"60 * HZ" means "60 seconds".
> would there be any issues raising this to say 180 seconds. This is the value we currently have for I/O
> timeout.
So you want to replace it by "180 * HZ", which is ... another magic number?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
