> -----Original Message----- > From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@xxxxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 11:39 PM > To: KY Srinivasan; H. Peter Anvin > Cc: olaf@xxxxxxxxx; bp@xxxxxxxxx; apw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; x86@xxxxxxxxxx; > tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [PATCH V2 1/1] X86: Hyper-V: Get the local APIC timer frequency > from the hypervisor > > >>> On 13.09.13 at 03:43, KY Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: H. Peter Anvin [mailto:hpa@xxxxxxxxx] > >> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 5:28 PM > >> To: KY Srinivasan > >> Cc: x86@xxxxxxxxxx; gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > >> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; olaf@xxxxxxxxx; apw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; > >> jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx; tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; JBeulich@xxxxxxxx; > bp@xxxxxxxxx > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/1] X86: Hyper-V: Get the local APIC timer frequency > >> from the hypervisor > >> > >> On 09/12/2013 05:06 PM, KY Srinivasan wrote: > >> > > >> > Peter, > >> > > >> > Let me know if you want me to address any additional issues in this patch. > >> > > >> > >> Please address Jan and Gleb's feedback. > > > > Gleb's feedback was a question and I answered that as I did Jan's feedback > > as well. > > Gleb, Jan, please let me know if there is something else you want addressed > > here. > > Indeed, apart from the question whether to change that one > message's level from KERN_INFO to KERN_DEBUG, there was > nothing really left unexplained (the aspect of the artificial tying > together of distinct features is really something KY has to > decide - I merely tried to point out that this is odd). Thanks Jan. Peter, if it is ok with you, I would like to keep the message level at KERN_INFO. Regards, K. Y _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
