On 09/05/2013 11:43 AM, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
We should count also dropped packets, otherwise the NAPI handler may end up running too long.
Is this actually a problem? If so ... the patch looks sane and you and add Acked-by me.
Signed-off-by: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@xxxxxx> --- drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-rx.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-rx.c b/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-rx.c index 34afc16..10e5416 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-rx.c +++ b/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-rx.c @@ -303,6 +303,7 @@ static int cvm_oct_napi_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget) if (backlog > budget * cores_in_use && napi != NULL) cvm_oct_enable_one_cpu(); } + rx_count++; skb_in_hw = USE_SKBUFFS_IN_HW && work->word2.s.bufs == 1; if (likely(skb_in_hw)) { @@ -429,7 +430,6 @@ static int cvm_oct_napi_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget) #endif } netif_receive_skb(skb); - rx_count++; } else { /* Drop any packet received for a device that isn't up */ /*
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel